Healthcare

Medicare for All is too costly only for those who think paying twice as much to an insurance company is cheaper.

Maxim:  Medicare for All is too costly only for those who think paying twice as much to an insurance company is cheaper.

Purpose:  To rebut those who claim that Medicare for All is a government “entitlement” we can’t afford by pointing out that, on net, people will save money.

Substitutions: For “Medicare for All,” may substitute “Universal Healthcare.”  For “paying twice as much to an insurance company is cheaper,” may substitute “paying half as much to a single payer system is more expensive.”

Explained:  Medicare for All will not be done solely with existing tax revenues.  It will involve some sort of new surcharge or tax.  That surcharge will replace health insurance premiums which people now pay.  Studies repeatedly show that insurance administration fees, pharmaceutical prices, and other expenses are much higher in the U.S. than in other countries, while delivering inferior medical treatment. Countries with universal healthcare are better able to control costs by cutting out insurance company “middle man” profits.  Additionally, by having more control over their medical delivery network, other countries have more negotiation leverage with pharmaceutical companies and are better able to prevent price gouging by medical providers.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.